Americans spend nearly a quarter of their time online on social networking sites and blogs, up from 15.8 percent just a year ago (43 percent increase) according to new research released today from The Nielsen Company. The research revealed that Americans spend a third their online time (36 percent) communicating and networking across social networks, blogs, personal email and instant messaging.
Top 10 Sectors by Share of U.S. Internet Time RANK Category Share of Time
June 2010Share of Time
June 2009% Change in
Share of Time1 Social Networks 22.7% 15.8% 43% 2 Online Games 10.2% 9.3% 10% 3 8.3% 11.5% -28% 4 Portals 4.4% 5.5% -19% 5 Instant Messaging 4.0% 4.7% -15% 6 Videos/Movies 3.9% 3.5% 12% 7 Search 3.5% 3.4% 1% 8 Software Manufacturers 3.3% 3.3% 0% 9 Multi-category Entertainment 2.8% 3.0% -7% 10 Classifieds/Auctions 2.7% 2.7% -2% Other 34.3% 37.3% -8% Source: The Nielsen Company “Despite the almost unlimited nature of what you can do on the web, 40 percent of U.S. online time is spent on just three activities – social networking, playing games and emailing leaving a whole lot of other sectors fighting for a declining share of the online pie,” said Nielsen analyst Dave Martin.
Additional findings include:
- Online games overtook personal email to become the second most heavily used activity behind social networks – accounting for 10 percent of all U.S. Internet time. Email dropped from 11.5 percent of time to 8.3 percent.
- Of the most heavily-used sectors, videos/movies was the only other to experience a significant growth in share of U.S. activity online. Its share of activity grew relatively by 12 percent from 3.5 to 3.9 percent. June 2010 was a major milestone for U.S. online video as the number of videos streamed passed the 10 billion mark. The average American consumer streaming online video spent 3 hours 15 minutes doing so during the month.
- Despite some predictions otherwise, the rise of social networking hasn’t pushed email and instant messaging into obscurity just yet. Although both saw double-digit declines in share of time, email remains as the third heaviest activity online (8.3 percent share of time) while instant messaging is fifth, accounting for four percent of Americans online time.
- Although the major portals also experienced a double digit decline in share, they remained as the fourth heaviest activity, accounting for 4.4 percent of U.S. time online.
Email Remains Top on Mobile Internet Activities
The way U.S. consumers spend their Internet time on their mobile phones paints a slightly different picture to that of Internet use from computers. In a Nielsen survey of mobile web users, there is a double-digit (28 percent) rise in the prevalence of social networking behavior, but the dominance of email activity on mobile devices continue with an increase from 37.4 percent to 41.6 percent of U.S. mobile Internet time.
Portals remain as the second heaviest activity on mobile Internet (11.6 percent share of time), despite their double digit decline and social networking’s rise to account for 10.5 percent share means the gap is much smaller than a year ago (14.3 percent vs. 8.3 percent).
Other mobile Internet activities seeing significant growth include music and video/movies, both seeing 20 percent plus increases in share of activity year over year. As these destinations gain share, it’s at the cost of other content consumption – both news/current events and sports destinations saw more than a 20 percent drop in share of U.S. mobile Internet time.
“Although we see similar characteristics amongst pc and mobile internet use, the way their activity is allocated is still pretty contrasting, added Martin. While convergence will continue, the unique characteristics of computers and mobiles, both in their features and when and where they are used mean that mobile Internet behavior mirroring its PC counterpart is still some way off.”
Tag Archives: social media
Like Facebook, Twitter Starts Using Algorithms To Bulk Up Social Graph
Last month, we noted that Twitter was testing a “You both follow” feature, showing users you and another user both follow. That’s interesting, but not particularly useful. Today, they’ve begun to roll out
a new “Suggestions for You” feature which looks at who you follow, and who the people you follow follow, and suggests new people for you to follow. Yes, just like Facebook does. This is very useful.
In fact, this is arguably the most useful social graph feature that Twitter has rolled out yet. A few weeks ago, Twitter rolled out a new name results area for search — which was incredibly helpful for finding celebrities or brands on Twitter. But this is better. This is all about finding people you may actually be interested in, but for whatever reason, haven’t connected with yet.
Calculating the cost of social media | Econsultancy
Imagine an advertising and marketing platform that reaches billions around the world, and doesn’t cost you a penny.
Free to get involved, free to share and promote content, with a massive locked-in audience who will actively promote your content for you.
Unfortunately it doesn’t exist. Social media is many things but despite several statements to the contrary, free is not one of them.
Many companies planning a social media campaign are attracted by the seemingly low set up costs and ongoing overheads involved, but scrape away that optimistic surface and you’ll find there’s a need for real investment if you want your campaign to function properly.
All businesses need a return, but when it comes to marketing, and particularly social media engagement, direct ROI can be difficult to clearly identify.
Ironically, it’s one area where figures feature prominently. With all that raw data sloshing around, you’d think that tracking would be an easy task, but unfortunately traditional ROI is in many cases too simplistic to fully measure either the cost or value of social media campaigns.
In order to really identify which return you’re getting from your campaign, you need to identify your investment and goals, and examine each aspect of these individually in order to determine effect.
At its core, social media ROI is a fairly straightforward measurement technique:
If your total expenditure is less than the value you receive, then you have positive return. If however your created value is not equal to your investment, then you have negative ROI and the wheels fall off your business fairly quickly.
Simple.
Or at least it seems to be.
The complications arise when you realize that every business has its own definitions of value, and of total expenditure. In order to really measure your return you’ll need to really nail down your costs and create an ongoing measurement model that can be applied to all your social media campaigns.
First, you’ll need to define exactly what ‘total expenditure’ implies.
There’s certainly a common myth that social media campaigns are free to run. Well, it’s true that setting up a Facebook page and sending tweets won’t cost a penny, but hiring someone to do that for you?
As with any campaign, you’ll need to run some fairly complicated breakdowns to ensure you aren’t caught out by hidden costs.
Here are four main areas you’ll need to consider:
Staff costs
Your costs need to include your marketer’s salaries. If you don’t have a dedicated social media campaign manager then you also need to work out the amount of time they are spending on that campaign.
How many man-hours a day does it actually take to manage, maintain and report your social media presence?
External fees
Do you outsource all or part of your social media campaign? You’ll need a detailed breakdown of billing. How much were you charged, and how was it calculated?
Agencies will have different rates for strategy, maintenance and time expended on execution. You’ll also need to work out if this is an ongoing cost and how that affects the value you’re receiving.
Advertising
There’s more to running successful campaigns than simply setting up and maintaining a presence on a social network.
You’ll also need to advertise that presence through both in-network and external ads (Certainly you can trim costs here by adding follow buttons to your email signatures, but remember to factor in the time your coders spend on small tasks like that).
This is the most obvious spend so hopefully you’ll already be tracking it closely, but there’s a need to recognize exactly how it factors into wider costs.
How much time is your web manager spending setting up targeted Facebook ads for example?
Other
There’s also a wealth of other social media specific software and equipment available. Many basic tools are available free, but if you need more in-depth tracking (and you do) then costs can quickly escalate.
You’ll be facing technical and creative costs and unlike many offline campaigns, these can run continuously.
These points should cover the basics, but it’s also worth considering the unique variables generated by your business and organizational structure. Some businesses will be able to benefit from sunk costs.
It’s certainly possible that you may have extra staff on hand and want to increase efficiency there by having them manage your social media day-o-day.
For larger groups there’s also the question of underspend. Does your budget have enough flexibility at the end of the year to facilitate extra social involvement?
These factors will vary from business to business, but before you begin hurling cash at social media its worth trimming costs by considering if you have content that can be repurposed, existing online brand assets or campaigns in other channels that would benefit from a social media boost.
By taking time at the start to properly examine cost, you’ll be in a far better position when it comes to calculating ROI and value.
BBC News website redesign divides opinion | Econsultancy
The BBC has unveiled its new look news website this morning, with a cleaner design and more social media integration the most obvious changes.
The site has only been live for a few hours, but has already attracted a fair amount of criticism from users. I’ve been taking a look at the new site…
This is the old BBC news page:
And the new version:
The new page has more white space and a little less clutter than the old version, partly thanks to the fact that the left hand navigational options have gone, replaced by a menu bar at the top of the page. I’m not sure about the new font though.
The video and live TV content is displayed more prominently on the right hand side of the page, the video is now shown in a larger size, while the site’s video content has been gathered together in one page.
The article pages have had the same treatment, with more white space behind the stories:
Old article page:
Instead of showing related links at the right hand side of the page, the top stories on the site and a box showing current features have been given more prominence. More links have been provided to allow readers to share articles on just about every social network, with Facebook and Twitter the most prominent.
Links to related articles and outbound links to other news sites are now shown at the foot of the page. This perhaps makes sense, since people will finish the article and want to read more, b
The new site seems to have divided opinion so far, which is natural for a redesign of such a popular website. Several commentors have picked up on the likeness to the CNN website, and the article pages on CNN are certainly similar.
There are 250+ comments on the BBC Editors’ Blog, and the majority of them are negative, though opinions via the Twitter hashtag #bbcnewssite are more positive towards the redesign. Stephen Fry likes it anyway…
Martin Belam has a good round up of the feedback on the new BBC site.
Social Networking Analysis
The Real Life Social Network v2
Social Media Era Set to Peak in 2012









